JUDGEMENT
A.MATEEN, J. -
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A.
(2.) Since a very trivial point is involved I propose to dispose of the petition at this initial stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer that the order dated 24.10.2002 be quashed.
(3.) From the order dated 24.10.2002 it comes out that the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court on the application, moved by the petioner under Section 340, 344 Cr.P.C. instead of disposing of the same had postponed disposal of the said application and ordered that said application may be disposed of after evidence is recorded in case No. 566/89.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.