VIRENDRA PAL SINGH Vs. DISTRICT CANE OFFICER
LAWS(ALL)-1992-11-93
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on November 25,1992

VIRENDRA PAL SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
DISTRICT CANE OFFICER, HALDWANI, NAINITAL Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Sudhir Narain, J. - (1.) THESE three appeals arise out of common judgment dated 10th September 1992, passed by a learned judge of this Court, whereby the Court did not exercise Che discretion under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, regarding services of the appellants as Seasonal Clerks.
(2.) THE appellants claimed that they were appointed as seasonal clerks by the Chairman. District Cane Services Authority, Rampur for Ganna Vikas Samiti. Vilaspur district Rampur by separate orders passed on 13-10-1986. Subsequently they were transferred to Ganna Samiti, Bilari District Moradabad by orders of the Deputy Cane Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad on 20-10-1986 THEy joined their dudes there but they were again transferred to the newly constituted Ganna Samiti, Gadarpur district Nainital by the orders of the Deputy cane Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad. THE appellants, after they were relieved from Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd, Bilari, gave their joining reports to the District Cane Officer, Haldwani. Nainital who posted them at Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd. Kichha, district Nainital on different dates between December 1987 and January 1988. Subsequently, the services of the appellants were terminated by the Special Secretary, Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd. Kichha, Nainital by order dated 10th June, 1988. The respondent filed counter affidavit and took the stand that the appellant were not appointed on 3rd October 1986 by the Chairman, District Cane Authority, Rampur for Ganna Vikas Samiti, Vilaspur, district Rampur. The photostat copies of their appointment letters were forged. The appellants were required to produce their original appointment letters by the special secretary, Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd. Kichha, Nainital but they failed to produce their appointment letters in original. The appellants were never appointed prior to 27-10-86 and after the said date the appointments were banned by the State Government by a general order. It is not necessary to go into the question regarding the date of original appointment of the appellants. It is admitted that they worked as seasonal clerks and certificates to tils effect were Issued in their favour by the special Secretary, Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd. Kichha, Nainital and the averments made in para 9 of the counter affidavit are relevent. Para 9 is quoted below : "9. That the contents of paragraph 7 of the writ petition as alleged are denied and it is stated that as the petitioner had worked in the Society in season 1987-88 they were issued certificates of good conduct by the secretary of the Society." The facts, as disclosed in the counter affidavit, clearly establish two undisputed facts firstly, that the appellants worked as seasonal clerks in crushing season 1987-88 and secondly, that seasonal period for which they were appointed also expired.
(3.) LEARNED counsel for the appellants firstly urged that the order of termination of the services of the appellants could not be passed by the Special secretary, Sahkari Ganna Samiti Ltd. Kichha, Nainital, as they were appointed by the District Cane Officer, Haldwani, district Nainital and in accordance with Regulation 34 of the U. P. Cane Cooperative Services Regulation 1975 (in short (the "Regulations" the services of an employee can be terminated only by appointing authority after giving him one week's notice or one week's salary in lieu thereof it terminated before close of the crushing season. Secondly the appointment letters were not forged and as the appellants had worked as seasonal clerks in the society they were entitled to continue in service even after the seasonal period came to an end. The services, In Cane Cooperative Societies, are governed by the provisions of U. P. Cane Cooperative Services Regulations 1975. Regulation 3 lays down classification of services and one of the classifications IS FOR 'seasonal staff' which Includes seasonal clerks. The recruitment and conditions of service of seasonal staff of a Cane Cooperative Society is governed by the provisions of Chapter IV of the Regulations. Regulation 21 provides that at the end of each crushing season the Secretary of the Cane Union shall classify the entire seasonal staff into 'A' and B' categories on the basis of their work done during the seasons and put up the category wise list of the seasonal staff before the Committee of the Management of the Union for approval Regulation 26 lays down that the staff placed in category 'A' shall be automatically re-employed in the next season unless the strength of seasonal staff has been reduced in any particular year to such as extent that it may not be possible to re-employ such staff.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.