K.P.Singh, J. - (1.) By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the judgments of the consolidation authorities whereby the share of the contesting opposite party has been declared as ⅓rd.
(2.) In the basic year the petitioners along with Ram Nath, contesting opposite party no. 4, were recorded over the disputed khatas. An objection was filed on behalf of Siya Ram and another with the allegations that Ram Nath was not son of Sheo Dayal and his name should be expunged from the disputed khatas.
(3.) The claim of the petitioners was resisted by the contesting opposite party and it was stated that the opposite party no. 4 Rain Nath was son of Sheo Dayal and was rightly recorded over the disputed Khatas.;