JUDGEMENT
K.B.Asthana, J. -
(1.) This is an application by one Sheikh Mahmood Muzaffar praying that he be enlarged on bail
pending his trial before the court of Session at Meerut on charges under sections 302/120-B/109
of Indian Penal Code. According to the prosecution case the applicant entered into a conspiracy
with certain other persons, who have also Been committed to stand their trial, to murder one Lala
Jai Prakash and in pursuance of that conspiracy the said Lala Jai Prakash was shot at on 30th
October 1961 at 6 or 6.30 p.m. in the village Rasulpur Dhaulari, police station Jani. A first
information report of the incident was lodged by one Hari Krishen Das in which it was stated
that one Mohammad Umar alias Bucha and two others shot at Lala Jai Prakash and they would
be identified by the witnesses in the light of the lantern burning there. It appears that the said
report was lodged at about 8.15 P.M. on the same date when Lala Jai Prakash was alive. It
further appears that Lala Jai Prakash was removed to the hospital at Meerut where his dying
declaration was recorded by a Tahsiidar Magistrate at about 10.30 P.M. Neither in the first
information report nor in the dying declaration any allegation is made against the present
applicant, Sheikh Mahamood Muzaffar.
According to the prosecution, the fact that it was the applicant at whose instance the murder had
taken place was discovered by them during the course of investigation later on. The applicant
was arrested on 29. 11. 1951. By an order dated 12.1.1962 a Magistrate of First Class of Meerut
has committed the applicant on charges under the abovesaid sections to stand his trial before the
court of Session. In the said order the learned Magistrate has referred to certain evidence from
which he has inferred that a prima facie case of conspiracy to murder has been made out against
the applicant. He has referred to the following evidence: (After narrating the evidence the
judgment proceeds:)
(2.) Before the learned Sessions Judge two applications were filed on behalf of the applicant for
his release on bail. The first application was filed during the pendency of the enquiry
proceedings before the learned Magistrate and the second application was filed after the
applicant had been committed for his trial before the Sessions Court. Both these applications
were rejected by the learned Sessions Judge on the ground that the applicant was charged with a
serious offence and the evidence against him was prima facie of a nature on the basis of which it
could reasonably be believed that he was guilty of an offence punishable with life imprisonment
or death.
(3.) In this application before me a detailed affidavit has been filed which has been sworn by
Sheikh Masood Muzaffar, son of the applicant, giving all the relevant facts and the
circumstances. On behalf of the prosecution two counter affidavits have been filed controverting
some of the allegations made in the affidavit of Sheikh Masood Muzaffar and placing other
circumstances of the case. I heard arguments at some length in this case.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.