JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS is an application in revision by one Bishambhar Rai. He purchased two camels from one
mohan for Rs. 800/ -. Mohan gave delivery of the said camels to Bishambhar Rai. There was
some dispute about the payment of price. Mohan went to Bishambhar Rai's place during his
absence and brought back the camels. He sent them to some other place obviously under the
impression that Bishambhar Rai would not find clue to the said camels and would thus be
prevented from creating any difficulty. Sometime later the camels disappeared. Mohan filed a
complaint under Section 379, I. P. C. against Bishambhar Rai alleging that he had stolen the
camels from the place to which they had been sent. The camels were recovered roaming about in
a certain village. In other words, they were not recovered from Bishambhar Rai's custody. The
criminal complaint filed by Mohan resulted in Bishambhar Rai's discharge. At the time of
passing the order of discharge, the learned Magistrate passed an order directing the delivery ' of
camels to Mohan. Against this order Bishambhar Rai preferred an appeal which was dismissed
by the learned Sessions Judge. He has now come up in revision.
(2.) IT may be stated at this stage that Mohan has since sold the said camels. I am informed that the
sale had taken place before the notice issued by this Court was served on him. It is now
contended by the learned counsel for Bishambhar Rai that this Court should direct Mohan to
deposit the price of the two camels in Court and that the said amount should be paid to him (Bishambhar Rai) on his furnishing security; I am afraid this Court is not competent to pass any
such order.
(3.) SECTION 517, Criminal P. C. empowers the High Court to pass an order for the disposal of the
property in respect of which the offence is said to have been committed. But this section
presupposes the existence of the property either in the custody of the Court or in the possession
of any party to the litigation or a supurdar or any other person who is amenable to the
jurisdiction of the Court. Sub-section (3) contemplates cases where livestock or other property
subject to speedy and natural decay, e. g. growing crop, may be ordered by the Court to be sold
before the question of disposal thereof is decided by it. In such cases the Court is empowered to
pass the order of disposal in respect of the money value of the property. This is contained in the
explanation to the said section.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.