JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS is a reference made by the learned Sessions Judge of Sitapur for setting aside the
conviction of Gokaran who has been convicted under Section 379, I. P. C. and sentenced to a
fine of Rs. 20/- for the theft of a 'razai'.
(2.) BIRBAL, Gokaran, Sahu and Bhallar were the four persons originally charged. All except
gokaran have been acquitted. The learned. Magistrate tried the case because according to him
bhallar had been previously convicted and consequently by reason of Section 59 of the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act the offence was not triable by a Panchayati Adalat. The learned Sessions
judge was of the opinion that the trial was not beyond the cognizance of the Panchayati Adalat
because only one of the accused persons was a previous convict at the most and even with regard
to him there was no evidence on the record to show that he was in fact a person who had been
convicted to three years or more imprisonment. He was also of the opinion that once the Court
had come to the conclusion that that person, namely, Bhallar was not guilty, it should have held
its hand and transferred the case to the Panchayati Adalat because at least without the presence
of Bhallar among the accused the Panchayati Adalat had jurisdiction.
(3.) SECTION 59 of the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act excludes from the jurisdiction of Panchayati
adalats any offence in which the accused " (a) has been previously convicted of an offence with
imprisonment of either description for a term of three years or more". What is excluded from the
jurisdiction of the Panchayati Adalat is the cognizance of the offence not against any particular
individual but of the whole offence. In the present case the allegation was that four persons
jointly committed the offence of theft. One of those persons has been sentenced on a previous
conviction to more than 3 years' imprisonment as is proved by an affidavit filed in this Court
which is not challenged by the learned counsel for the applicant. The Panchayati Adalat had,
therefore, no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offence at all and could not hold the trial.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.