ASHOK KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
LAWS(ALL)-2012-1-443
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on January 11,2012

ASHOK KUMAR Appellant
VERSUS
State of U.P. and another Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Bala Krishna Narayana, J. - (1.) HEARD learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
(2.) THE present application under 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 473 of 2011, under Sections -23, 25 and 59 of the Standards of Weight and Measures Act, 1976 pending in the Court of J. M., Mau. The contention of the counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.
(3.) FROM the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, : A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal,, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma,, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para -10), 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicant has got a right of discharge under Section -245 Cr.P.C. through a proper application for the said purpose and he is free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.