JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) HEARD Learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate. This writ petition has been filed for quashing of an FIR in case crime No. 399 of 2011 under Sections 498A, 323, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Etmadpur, District, Agra.
(2.) THE writ court is not competent to go into questions of facts and on the allegations, it cannot be said that no prima facie case is disclosed.
(3.) HENCE , the FIR cannot be quashed by this Court at this stage.
However, in view of the contention of the counsel for the petitioners that dispute can be settled amicably between the parties and the petitioners are ready to deposit expenses for the mediation, it is provided that if the petitioners deposit Rs. 7000/before District Legal Services Authority, Agra out of which Rs. 5000/shall be given to Smt. Sarika Jain on her appearance before the mediating agency and appears before the Magistrate concerned within three weeks from today, the magistrate concerned shall release the petitioners on interim bail on their furnishing personal bonds. After releasing the petitioners on interim bail, the magistrate concerned shall himself or through any agency existing for mediation/conciliation or counseling in the district send the matter for mediation/conciliation or counseling and in case the matter is amicably resolved in the said proceedings, the Investigating Agency and the court concerned may take a decision as to whether final report may be submitted or appropriate orders be passed in the criminal proceedings. The mediating agency shall inform the factum of success or failure of the mediation within one week of conclusion of the mediation/conciliation proceedings. In case the matter could not be resolved in the mediation proceedings, the court concerned may consider the matter of final bail on merits in accordance with law.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.