DR. SADAKAT HUSAIN Vs. STATE OF U.P.
LAWS(ALL)-2012-5-48
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on May 17,2012

SADAKAT HUSAIN Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
(2.) THIS application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding of Case No. 2390 of 2012 (State Vs. Akram and others) arising out of case crime no. 2085 of 2011, under section 363 IPC, Police Station-Kotwali, District-Badaun, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Badaun. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicant has got a right of discharge under Section 239 or 227/228 Cr.P.C. as the case may be through a proper application for the said purpose and he is free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court.
(3.) THE prayer for quashing of the entire proceedings of the aforementioned case is refused. However, in the circumstances of the case, it is provided that if the applicant moves an application for surrender before the court concerned within four weeks from today, the court concerned shall fix a date about ten days thereafter for the appearance of the applicant and in the meantime release the applicant on interim bail on such terms and conditions as the court concerned considers fit and proper till the date fixed for the disposal of the regular bail.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.