JUDGEMENT
DEVENDRA PRATAP SINGH,J. -
(1.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has made a statement that he does not
wish to file any rejoinder affidavit.
(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record.
This petition is directed against an order dated 2nd of September 2007 by which the selection of the petitioner has been cancelled.
(3.) IT is pleaded that in pursuance of an advertisement dated 6.1.2005 and 21.1.2005, the petitioner had applied for recruitment to the post of Constable. After being selected, he was appointed on 15.5.2005. While he was posted in
Bareilly, he was served with the impugned order cancelling his selection
without giving any notice or opportunity. It is further pleaded that he had
given an affidavit dated 16.4.2005 at the time of his selection that no criminal
case was ever lodged or was pending against him and he was never arrested
in any criminal case. It is further pleaded that from the impugned order he
came to know that a Criminal Case No.121 of 2000 had been lodged against
him at Police Station G.R.P., Shahjahanpur under Section 3/25 of the Arms
Act. It is also pleaded that he neither knew about the said case nor was ever
arrested or interrogated in it. It is then pleaded that after receiving the
impugned order, he found out that a false case was registered whereafter he
was acquitted vide order dated 1.2.2008. It is explained that some body had
got lodged a false case against him in collusion with G.R.P. and made
complaint to the D.I.G. who got it enquired, whereafter the impugned order
was passed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.