JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) KISSAN Vidya Sabha Shamli, Prabudh Nagar is duly
registered society which runs two Institutions namely R.K. P.G.
College and R.K. Inter College, Shamli. The R.K. P.G. College,
Shamli, District Muzaffar Nagar is affiliated with Chaudhary
Charan Singh University, Meerut and the other Institution
namely R.K. Intermediate College is recognised under the U.P.
Intermediate Education Act 1921. The affairs of the society is
governed by its bye-laws, which is duly registered. Inevitable
fall out of an election held in the management of the society
results invariably in rival claims being made by the parties
claiming to be legally constituted managing committee. Similar
set of controversy is being raised in the present writ petition. In
order to resolve the controversy in the present case certain
facts are noted herein below:
(2.) THE dispute arose in respect of an election of the committee of Management/office bearers of the society which
was held on 21.8.2005. In the said election one Ved Singh was
elected as Secretary and Sri Jai Prakash was elected as
President. Vice Chancellor, Chaudhary Charan Singh
University, Meerut passed an order recognising the election of
respondent no. 4 Ved Singh on 6.10.2006. Election was
affirmed by the Vice Chancellor after enquiry into the
complaints filed against the said election which was enquired
by the City Magistrate, Muzaffar Nagar. Rival election was set
up by Sri Babu Singh who placed the papers of his election
before the Deputy Registrar, who referred the dispute to the
Prescribed Authority for its consideration under Section 25(1) of
the Societies Registration Act 1860. The Prescribed Authority in
its order passed on 10.3.2008 held that the election held on
21.8.2005 in which contesting respondent Sri Ved Singh was elected as Secretary was valid. It also held that the electoral
college on the basis of which the said election was conducted
was valid. This order was not questioned before any forum.
Fresh election was ordered by the vice chancellor by issuing a direction on 21.7.2008 which was to be held through
the election officer who would be appointed by the University
with the consent of the both the contesting parties. Election
Officer who was appointed for conducting the election published
election programme in the news paper Dainik Keshari on
12.9.2008. All the members of the general body were informed about the aforesaid election programme. As a part of process of
election, list of members of the general body was pasted on the
notice board of the College by the Election Officer inviting
objection thereto. After examining the objection filed Election
Officer published the final list of voters on 13.8.2008. Election
Officer after getting the election held submitted a detailed report
before the Vice Chancellor, Assistant Registrar, Firms, Society
and Chits and District Inspector of Schools. Election was held
on 24.8.2008. One Babu Singh set up rival claim for being duly
elected office bearer of the Society on the same date i.e.
24.8.2008. He stated that the election which was held on the said date one Maharaj Singh was elected as President and
Dhruvraj was elected as Vice President. Vice Chancellor vide
his order dated 16.2.2009 refused to accord approval to the
election of the managing committee conducted by two rival
parties and directed that fresh election of the committee be held
within one month. This order was challenged by the respondent
no. 4 Ved Singh in Civil Misc Writ Petition No. 11575 of 2009
wherein an interim order was passed staying the order passed
by the Vice Chancellor. However, the said writ petition was
dismissed in default on 13.3.2012. Restoration application was
also filed. Prescribed authority after examining the rival claim of
the parties upheld the election of contesting respondent no. 4. It
held that the claim set up by Babu Singh for election of 2008
was bogus. The said finding was recorded on the basis that it
was always outgoing committee which was empowered to hold
the election.
(3.) DISPUTE regarding election of 2008 which have been referred to the Prescribed Authority remained pending till 2011.
It transpires that in the meanwhile fresh election of Committee
of Management was held in which three rival claims were filed
i.e. one by the petitioner; other by the respondent no. 4 and
third by the respondent no. 5. They claim to have constituted
the managing committee on the basis of election which were
held in this behalf. Following date of holding the election were
indicated which is as under:
(a) Petitioners' date of election was 4.9.2011; (b) Respondent No. 4 Ved Singh's date of election was 29.8.2011; (c) Respondent no. 5 Babu Singh's date of election was 12.10.2009. ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.