JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the respondents.
(2.) This writ petition arises out of proceedings for determination of deficiency in stamp duty under Section 47-A of Stamp Act. The first order challenged through this writ petition was passed on 28.2.1996 in case no.54/252 under Section 33/47-A Indian Stamp Act Banwari Lal vs. Jai Devi and others by Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), Etah. The matter related to the sale deed dated 6.6.1994 in respect of agricultural land admeasuring 0.32 acres (1/3rd part of plot no.150 total area 0.96 acres). The land (0.32 acres) was purchased by three persons jointly. In the order dated 28.2.1996 it was mentioned that as three persons had purchased hence the share of each was about 0.11 acre hence it must be treated to be abadi land and stamp duty should have been paid according to circle rate for the abadi i.e. Rs.600 per sq. meter. On the request of the petitioner Tehsildar was directed to inspect the spot who submitted the report on 12.9.1995 after inspection. Tehsildar reported that the land in dispute was agricultural. The A.D.M.(Finance & Revenue) held that the Tehsildar did not indicate that agriculture was actually being done in the land in dispute. Accordingly the report of Sub-Registrar was approved and value was determined to be Rs.7,76,832/-. Deficiency in stamp duty payable on the said valuation (after deducting the stamp duty already paid) came to Rs.1,04,545/-. Rs.100/- were imposed as penalty. Against the said order petitioner filed stamp Revision no. 90 of 1996-97 which was dismissed on 15.5.1998 by Chief Controlling Revenue Authority/Board of Revenue, Allahabad. The said order has also been challenged through this writ petition.
(3.) In the sale deed valuation was shown to be Rs.56,000/-. In the impugned orders it is also mentioned that the village where land in dispute is situate is adjacent to Nagar Palika boundary. The purchasers in the sale deed were Jai Devi petitioner, Smt. Satyawati and Smt. Maharani.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.