DINESH PRATAP SINGH Vs. REGIONAL DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER
LAWS(ALL)-2002-8-170
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on August 21,2002

DINESH PRATAP SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
REGIONAL DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Anjani Kumar, J. - (1.) The petitioner, who was an employee of respondent, is aggrieved by the order dated 18th November, 1986 and 24th January, 1992 and 20th February, 1993 whereby the State Government has not referred the dispute under the provisions of Section 4K of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act for adjudication before the labour court concerned. Against these orders, the petitioner filed the writ petition before this Hon'ble Court being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 17367 of 1993. A learned single Judge of this Court dismissed the aforesaid writ petition by the judgment and order dated 10th May, 1993. Aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge the petitioner preferred a Special Appeal being special appeal No. 409 of 1993. This special appeal was allowed and the judgment of the learned single Judge was set aside. In the aforesaid special appeal, this Court issued the following direction : "The contention of Dr. Padia is that since the State Government itself did not state the reason in the order of rejection, the petitioner/appellant could not be called upon to prove existence of the Industrial Dispute. On perusal of the impugned order and considering the submission made, we are inclined to take the view that the matter should be remitted to the State Government for consideration and disposal afresh by a reasoned order. This order will be complied within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before respondent No. 1. With these observations, this special appeal is finally disposed of."
(2.) Pursuant to the aforesaid direction, the matter was again remitted back to the authority under the mechanism of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act for making reference, i.e., Conciliation Officer, who has already submitted a report before the matter came to this Court that there exists no industrial dispute between the parties and he, therefore, referred the matter to the delegatee of the State Government, i.e., the Deputy Labour Commissioner. The Deputy Labour Commissioner by order dated 31st October, 1996, which is impugned in the present writ petition, has given reasons by holding that there does not exist any industrial dispute which may warrant interference under Section 4K of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act. Now the present writ petition is filed against the order dated 31st October, 1996, which has been annexed as Annexure-15 to the writ petition.
(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Padia submitted that firstly the order has not been passed by the State Government and it has been passed by the Deputy Director Labour Commissioner and secondly, that before passing of the aforesaid order dated 31st October, 1996, the petitioner had not been afforded an opportunity to establish that there exists industrial dispute between the parties. In order to appreciate this argument from the scheme of the Act, the documents filed as Annexures-C.A. 1, C.A. 2 and C.A. 3 to the counter-affidavit also required to be perused. Annexure-C.A. 2 is the order of appointment of the petitioner which stipulates the terms and conditions which are reproduced below : "(1) You are appointed in the capacity of Supervisor to work at our Agra Centre with effect from 1st June, 1986. (2) You will assist the Veterinary Officer, Incharge of Agra Centre in supervising the blood collection, inspection, defibrination, separation and preservation of blood and haemoglobin. You will also be responsible for proper cleaning of equipments and maintenance of proper records etc. (3) Your appointment is purely on a temporary basis for a period of six months. However, you will be considered for further extension if the necessity continues and also on your performance. (4) During the temporary period of your appointment you will be paid a consolidated gross salary of Rs. 800 (Rs. eight hundred only) per month. (5) Your normal working period will be as per the working of the Slaughter House. (6) You will be working under our Veterinary Officer, Incharge of Agra Centre. (7) It will be your duty not to use for your own purpose disclose or divulge to other persons whether during or after your employment any confidential information received by you in the course of your employment with us. Confidential information includes trades secrets, whether written or unwritten. (8) You agree and undertake that in case of termination of your service under whatever conditions it may happen, you will not use for yourself nor disclose or divulge to others any information or trade secrets concerning your work or that of any of your colleagues and in case of your committing breach of any of the terms of this agreement, you will be liable to be sued for damages. (9) Your services during the temporary period can be terminated at any time without assigning any reason whatsoever on 15 days' notice. In case you wish to resign during this period, you shall have to give 15 days' notice to us." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.