JUDGEMENT
G.P.Mathur, Vineet Saran, J. -
(1.) This appeal under Order XLlII Rule l(a). Code
of Civil Procedure, has been filed challenging
the order dated 4-2-2002 of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jhansi, by which it was held that
the court at Lucknow alone had territorial jurisdiction to try the suit and the court at Jhansi
had no territorial jurisdiction to try the same.
(2.) The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit
against the defendant-respondent claiming the
following reliefs :
(a) That a decree for declaration to
this effect that, both the Bank
Guarantees Nos. 84/4 and 84/5
dated 13-8-1984 and 18-10-
1984, respectively given in Tender contract No. 18-84-85 and 19-
84-85 Steel Cell department of the
defendants No. 1 to 3 by defendant No. 4 are not enforceable, as
there is no default on the part of
the plaintiff and no amount is due
to the defendants Nos. 1 to 3, be
ordered to be passed in favour of
the plaintiff against the defendants
1 to 4.
(b) That the defendant No. 4 be restrained by means of prohibitory
permanent injunction, restraining
the defendants from encashing two
bank guarantees the details of
which has been given in sub clause
(a) clause 1 of this relief.
(cj Cost of the suit be awarded
(d) Any other relief to which the plaintiff is found entitled legally as well
as equitably be also passed.
(3.) The defendant filed a written statement
and one of the pleas taken therein was that
the courts at Jhansi had no jurisdiction to try
the suit. There is not dispute that the parties
had entered into an agreement on 19-10-1984
and clause 17 of the agreement provided
that in case of any dispute the Court at
Lucknow alone will have jurisdiction to decide
the dispute.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.