PRAN MURGAI Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2002-5-46
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on May 07,2002

Pran Murgai Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

B.K.RATHI,J. - (1.) HEARD Sri P.N. Mishra, Senior Advocate Assisted by Sri Apul Mishra, learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA.
(2.) THE applicant was one of the Directors of the Finance Company M/s. Schematic Finance Ltd. The deposits were taken from various persons by the Company and agreed to return with interest and issued post dated cheques. However, the company closed the office of Meerut and flee away from the city. Therefore, the opposite parties filed similar complaints for offence under Sections 406 and 420 IPC against the applicant and other Directors of the company in which they have been summoned. Request has been made for quashing of the complaints filed by the depositors. The points involved in all these petitions are identical and therefore, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.
(3.) FIRSTLY , it is contended that the applicant is member of the Delhi Stock Exchange and according to the terms of membership the applicant cannot work as whole time Director. However, there is no bar in becoming part time Director of the Finance Company and even if he was part time director, it is not material.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.