VIDYA SHANKER Vs. REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES LUCKNOW
LAWS(ALL)-2002-9-124
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on September 05,2002

VIDYA SHANKER Appellant
VERSUS
REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, LUCKNOW Respondents

JUDGEMENT

S.P.Mehrotra - (1.) -This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer : "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 18.12.2000 passed by respondent No. 1 filed as (Annexure-16 of the writ petition). (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent No. 1 to pay pension and other retiral benefit to the petitioner. (c) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent No. 1 to produce previous enquiry report and recommendation of Deputy Registrar (Admin) and Additional Registrar (Admin) Head Quarter for the perusal of the Hon'ble Court. (d) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. (e) Award the costs of petition to the petitioner."
(2.) IT was, inter alia, alleged that the petitioner was working on the post of Co-operative Inspector Grade-I ; and that disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner ; and that the petitioner had earlier filed writ petition being Writ Petition No. 26395 of 1999 which was disposed of on 6th July, 1999, with the direction to the enquiry officer to conclude the proceedings within two months from the date of production of certified copy of the order of the Court ; and that the said order of the Court was served on the concerned respondent ; and that inquiry proceedings against the petitioner were concluded within time and nothing was found against the petitioner ; and that on 31st December, 1999, the petitioner retired from the service ; and that by the order dated 18th December, 2000, a fresh inquiry was directed against the petitioner. Thereupon the petitioner filed the present writ petition. On 16th May, 2001, time was granted to the learned standing counsel for filing counter-affidavit. However, no counter-affidavit has been filed so far. During the pendency of the writ petition, application dated 11th July, 2002, supported by an affidavit has been filed in the present writ petition. Along with the said application, the petitioner has filed copy of the order dated 29th September, 2001, passed by the Registrar Co-operative Societies, U. P., Lucknow, respondent No. 1. A perusal of the said order dated 29th September, 2001, shows that pursuant to the order dated 18th December, 2000, inquiry proceedings against the petitioner continued, and ultimately, inquiry officer submitted its report dated 9th August, 2001 and held that the petitioner was partially guilty of the charge Nos. 2 and 4. Further, from the said order dated 29th September, 2001, it transpires that after receiving the inquiry report, the Registrar Co-operative Societies, U. P., Lucknow, considered the matter and, inter alia held that the petitioner could not be held guilty of the charges levelled against him, and as such, the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner were dropped. The said order dated 29th September, 2001, inter alia, also states that the suspension period of the petitioner would be deemed/treated to be in service and the petitioner would be entitled to all dues for the said period.
(3.) IN view of the said order dated 29th September, 2001, filed by the petitioner as Annexure-1 to the said application dated 11th July, 2002, it is evident that prayers (a) and (c) made in the writ petition have become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submitted that the petitioner is entitled to the arrears of salary and other retiral benefits, and in this regard, the petitioner has made representations to various authorities vide Annexures-2, 3 and 4 to the said application dated 11th July, 2002.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.