JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) In the instant case the impugned order dated 8-1-2002 is without jurisdiction because the electoral Officer has in a way permitted use of Form 8 even when the objection in an existing entry in the electoral roll has been made by a third person and not by the petitioner.
(2.) Rule 13 (3) of the Registration of Electorals Rules, 1960 framed under the Representation of People Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred as the 'Rules' and the 'Act' respectively) do not permit the type of decision which has been passed inasmuch as the petitioner never objected to the entry which was existing in the Electoral Roll.
(3.) Since inherent lack of jurisdiction emanates from the impugned order, no appeal lay and even if it is held by this Court that appeal lies, on the facts and circumstances of the case, said alternative remedy be not imposed as a bar to the petitioner. Petitioner is approaching this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directly for there is every likelihood that notice for election may be published in one or two days with the result that the petitioner will now, in view of the impugned order, stand debarred from contesting the same.
2. Shri R. K. Saxena, learned Standing Counsel has opposed the writ petition and has relied upon the provisions which exist under the Act and the Rules and has said that no case for interference with the impugned order is made out and at best the petitioner can be relegated to the appellate authority.
3. No body can challenge the electoral roll and the entry made therein except in accordance with the Act and the Rules, and the authorities asked to oversee the amendments of the electoral rolls which govern the election rights of every citizen in this country, have to act with utmost vigil and uprightness. therefore, paramount importance should be attached to the existing entries or those which are permitted to be corrected or amended or substituted in place of the existing entries before the election process begins or during the election process if law so permits, as the case may be, and for that matter strict adherence to the procedure is expected.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.