RACHHIT PANDEY Vs. STATE OF U. P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Dharm Pal Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General alongwith Sri Sanjay Sharma, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State-respondents and Sri Satyendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.4.

(2.) The present petition has been filed for a writ of habeas corpus praying for the following reliefs:-

(3.) The order sheet of the case indicates that at the very outset when the case was taken up on 27.02.2020, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner no.2 did not want the custody of the corpus i.e. the petitioner no.1 and that he was pressing the petition only for visitation rights. The aforementioned contention as noticed in the order dated 27.02.2020 is as follows:-