JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The narrative is being structured in the following framework to facilitate the discussion:
I. Defining the controversy and its origins
II. Submissions of learned counsels
III. Right of bail
IV. SC and ST Act- Relevant provisions: Discussion
V. Final Directions
VI. Review of Compliance of Directions
VII. Consideration of Bail Application on merits
I. Defining the controversy and its origins
(2.) The amendments to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 19891
made in the year
2016, brought in their wake an alteration in the practice and procedure for hearing of bail applications.
1 hereinafter referred to as the "Act"
(3.) Learned counsels for the applicants in all connected bail applications pointed out certain anomalies in the practices of
hearing of bail applications/bail appeals under the Act. This has
created inconsistencies in the procedure for hearing of bail
applications/bail appeals, uncertainty in the period of
maturation of bail applications/bail appeals, and deferment of
hearing of bail applications/bail appeals under the Act for
undefined periods.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.