JUDGEMENT
Samit Gopal,J. -
(1.) Heard Sri Babloo Pant, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Raj Kumar Gupta, learned brief holder for the State and perused the record.
The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant namely Aas Mohammad in Case Crime No. 414 of 2020, under Sections 307, 332, 353, 429, 504 IPC, Police Station- Jani, District Meerut.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The present case is a case of no injury as stated in para 13 of the affidavit. It is further argued that the applicant is although named in the First Information Report but his name has surfaced in the statement of co-accused Anees and Arif who were arrested from the spot but the applicant was said to have run away from the place from where the said two persons were arrested. It is further argued that the applicant has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 4 of the supplementary affidavit.
Learned brief holder for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, considering the nature of accusation, the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.
In the event of arrest of the applicant, Aas Mohammad involved in Case Crime No. 414 of 2020, under Sections 307, 332, 353, 429, 504 IPC, Police Station- Jani, District Meerut, he shall be released on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report, if any, under section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police office as and when required;
(ii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office;
(iii) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.
In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.
The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudice by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.
The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.