Bala Krishna Narayana, J. - (1.) HEARD Smt. Sunita Agarwal, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Sri Anupam Kulshrestha, learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 to 10. This writ petition has been filed by the Petitioners with a prayer for issuing a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 10.2.2004 (annexure No. 5 to the writ petition) passed in Revision No. 29 of 1992 -93 and order dated 22.9.1992 (annexure No. 4 to the writ petition) passed by Respondent Nos. 7 and 10 respectively.
(2.) BRIEF facts of the case as emerging from the pleadings of the parties are that Har Prasad -Respondent No. 1 and four others, Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 in this writ petition filed Suit No. 47 of 1989 -90 under Section 229 -B of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for being declared bhumidhars of Plot Nos. 81/1, 156, 157Aa, 161 -v, 162, 163, 225, 226 area 1.843 hectares of Khata No. 22, Plot Nos. 82, 90 -M, 135 -M, 138 -v, 140 -c, 143 -c, area 1.763 hectares of Khata No. 12 and plot Nos. 140 -t area 0.127 hectares of Khata No. 125 situate in Village Bhamola Mafi, Tehsil Kole, District Aligarh (hereinafter referred to as the land in dispute) before the Sub -Divisional Officer/Assistant Collector -Ist, Aligarh Respondent No. 9. In the said suit, the Respondent Nos. 6, 11 and 12 in this writ petition were arrayed as Defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3. The Plaintiffs -Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 claimed that the land in dispute was not located within the municipal limits on 7.7.1949 and its zamindari had been abolished and the provisions of the Act were applicable to the same. Plaintiffs further claimed that they were recorded as ex -proprietary tenants (Kastkar Sakitul Milkiyat) of Khata Nos. 2 and 12 and hereditary tenants (Maurusi Kastkar) of Khata No. 25 and upon abolition of zamindari they became sirdars of the land in dispute under Section 19 of the Act and had thereafter become bhumidhars with transferable rights of the same by virtue of the provisions of U.P. Act No. 8 of 1977. In the said suit written statement was filed by D.G.C. Revenue on behalf of the Respondent No. 6 and Gaon Sabha Bhamola Mafi denying the plaint allegations. Respondent Nos. 11 and 12 despite being served with the summons of the suit chose not to file any written statement. In order to establish their claim over the land in dispute, the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 filed extracts of Khataunis of Khata Nos. 2, 12, 25 of Village Gram Bhamola Mafi of the years 1396 -1401 fasli, copies of the notices given by the Plaintiffs to the State under Section 80 Code of Civil Procedure, Section 106 of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, acknowledgement receipt No. 308, registry receipt Nos. 307 and 308 dated 18.9.1998, certificate of bhumidhari sanad No. 58965 dated 14.3.1972, photo -stat copies of extracts of Khataunis of Khata Nos. 26 and 27 of Village Bhamola Mafi Pargana & Tehsil Kole, District Aligarh of 1377 Fasli, photo -stat copy of the notification No. 1896/11 -292 -35 dated 25.7.1936, photo -stat copy of the notification dated 17.9.1995, photo -stat copy of the notification mentioning the areas comprised within the limits of Nagar Palika Aligarh, photo -stat copy of map of Village Bhamola Mafi, copy of non -Z.A. Khasra of Village Bhamola Mafi of 1395 fasli in which the names of the father of the Plaintiffs -Respondents Mohan Lal was recorded in column -4, photo -stat of khasra non -Z.A. of village Bhamola Mafi of 1377 fasli and copy of khasra non -Z.A. of village Bhamola Mafi 1359 Fasli.
(3.) THE Plaintiffs examined Har Prasad Respondent No. 5 on their behalf as P.W. The Respondent No. 4 after taking into consideration the entire evidence on record and the respective claims set up by the parties in their pleadings in respect of the land in dispute decreed the Suit No. 47 of 1989 -90 by his judgment dated 8.8.1990 and decree dated 3.12.1990 (annexure No. 12 to the writ petition) and declared the Plaintiff Respondent 5. Nos. 1 to 5 bhumidhars of the land in dispute.;