SHYAM NARAYAN SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U P AND ANOTHER
LAWS(ALL)-2011-9-724
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on September 26,2011

Shyam Narayan Singh And Others Appellant
VERSUS
State Of U P And Another Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA and perused the record.
(2.) The investigating officer, on completion of the investigation, found sufficient materials against the applicants and accordingly submitted the charge sheet. The learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offences. The materials collected during the investigation fully justify submission of the charge sheet by the investigating officer and taking of cognizance by the Magistrate. There does not appear to be any justification to exercise inherent power under section 482 CrPC.
(3.) Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the respondent No.2 subsequent to lodging of the f.I.R., executed a fresh agreement for sale in favour of the applicants, therefore, the previous agreement which is alleged to be forged has been diluted. This aspect is only relevant for bail purposes not for quashing the charge-sheet.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.