BHOJVEER SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
LAWS(ALL)-2011-4-474
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on April 05,2011

Bhojveer Singh Appellant
VERSUS
State of U.P. and Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Dilip Gupta, J. - (1.) IT is stated that as the Gram Pradhan was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, a casual vacancy arose which has been filled up by the District Magistrate exercising powers under Section 12 -J of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') by appointment of Respondent No. 4 Mahendra Singh against the casual vacancy.
(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that in view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Udaiveer Singh v. State Election Commission and Ors., 2009 (6) RD 121, the casual vacancy could have been filled up in accordance with the wishes of the elected members. He, therefore, submits that the District Magistrate could not have made any nomination on his own under Section 12 -J of the Act without convening a meeting of the members of the Gram Panchayat. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondents does not dispute this position, but what he contends is that in view of the fact that a nomination has already been made by the District Magistrate, the Respondent No. 4 may be permitted to continue till a fresh nomination is made by the District Magistrate on the basis of the resolution of the Gram Panchayat.
(3.) IT is true that the District Magistrate has nominated Respondent No. 4 Mahendra Singh under Section 12 -J of the Act to discharge the duties and exercise the powers of the Pradhan until such vacancy in the office of the Pradhan is filled up but in view of the law laid down in the aforesaid judgment of the Division Bench, it is ordered that the District Magistrate shall convene a meeting of the Gram Panchayat members as expeditiously as is possible preferably within a period of four weeks to make recommendations for nomination of the member of the Gram Panchayat to discharge the duties and exercising the powers of Pradhan during the interregnum period, but till such recommendations are made and accepted by the District Magistrate, the Respondent No. 4 Mahendra Singh who has been nominated by the District Magistrate under Section 12 -J of the Act shall continue to function.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.