- (1.) HEARD Ms. Arti Raje, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State -Respondents.
(2.) THE Petitioner appears to be aggrieved by the impugned order dated 14.9.2011 passed by the Director, Higher Education, U.P. Allahabad by which the Petitioner's representation for approval of her services has been rejected on the ground that the Government Order dated 7.4.1998, on the strength of which the appointment of the Petitioner was made, has now been repealed. It is contended by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner's appointment was made after due advertisement for the session 2007 -08 and papers with regard to the grant of approval were sent before the Director, Higher Education, U.P. Allahabad, Respondent No. 2, but the Respondent No. 2 has not taken any decision thereon and thereafter the Committee of Management permitted the Petitioner to continue on the aforesaid post and the Petitioner is still continuing. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has also drawn our attention towards the decision of this Court dated 10.8.2011 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 27460 of 2010 Dr. Smt. Vibha Jain v. State of Uttar Pradesh. whereby this Court has held that the ground of imposing ban on appointment vide Government Order dated 12.12.2006 for not approving the services of the Petitioner in the said case and other similarly situated persons is unsustainable. So far as the repeal of the Government Order dated 7.4.1998 is concerned, in that regard also the Court has observed that as the Respondents are permitting to continue all those appointees who have been appointed on the strength of the Government Order dated 7.4.1998, therefore, the Government cannot take different stand for the present Petitioner. In the submission of the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner the facts of this case are identical to the facts of the case in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 27460 of 2010 Dr. Smt. Vibha Jain v. State of U.P.
(3.) ON 20.9.2011 learned Standing Counsel was granted time to seek instructions in this regard. In the instructions which the learned Standing Counsel has received the same ground has been reiterated i.e. the imposition of ban vide Government Order dated 12.12.2006 and the repeal of the earlier Government Order dated 7.4.1998 on the strength of which the appointment of the present Petitioner has been made.;