- (1.) SHRI Chandra Prakash Khare -Respondent No. 1 is represented by Shri A.D. Prakash. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Namdeo is represented by Shri Abhishek Rai. Both Shri A.D. Prakash and Shri Abhishek Rai are allowed two week's time to file counter affidavit. The Petitioner will have one week, thereafter, to file rejoinder affidavit. List on 18th March, 2011.
(2.) THE educational qualification prescribed for E.D. Paker is Class -VIII; with preference to be given to the persons, who are matriculate. The Respondent No. 1 was selected on the basis of his marks in Class -VIII examination. His appointment was canceled after it was found that his mark sheet was not genuine. The departmental enquiry was held ex parte without giving any notice to him. Shri Chandra Prakash Khare had earlier challenged the selection on which a direction was issued in O.A. by C.A.T. presided by Hon'ble S.R. Singh, J., the then Vice Chairman, C.A.T. that the selection be made on the basis of marks secured in High School examination.
(3.) IN the scrutiny of marks Shri Sanjeev Kumr Namdeo - Respondent No. 3 was found to have secured 60.30 marks in Class -X, and was issued appointment letter. Shri Devendra Kumar Rawat at Sl. No. 4 (para 5 of the writ petition) made compliant that qualification of Technical Education Board of Shri Namdeo was not equivalent to High School. On the basis of the letter of the District Inspector of Schools and Government Order it was found that technical qualification of Shri Namdeo was equivalent to High School, and he was appointed.;