JUDGEMENT
RAJIV SHARMA, J. -
(1.) IN the instant writ petition the petitioner has questioned the validity and
correctness of the order dated 30.6.1994
passed by the Sub Divisional Officer,
Mohammadi, District Lakhimpur Kheri as
contained in Annexure-1 to the writ
petition and has also prayed for a
direction to the respondents not to recover
the amount indicated in the impugned
order.
(2.) IT has been submitted by the Counsel for the petitioner that in the year 1979, one Ikhlas Ahmad resident of Town
Mohammadi, Kheri had orally gifted a
plot of 1170 sq. feet, situated in town
Mohammadi, Kheri in favour of the
petitioner and thereafter, the petitioner
constructed his residential house over the
said plot and is residing since then. It has
also been submitted that there is neither
any deed nor any instrument executed or
in writing entered into between the
parties, regarding transfer of the said plot.
Subsequently, on an application by the
petitioner, the Municipal Board mutated
the name of the petitioner in place of
Ikhlas Ahmad. Later on, respondent no.2
issued a notice on 10.8.1993 asking the
petitioner to show cause as to why the
requisite stamp duty and ten time penalty
be not imposed and recovered from him.
Petitioner, in his reply, stated that there was neither any occasion nor any
question to pay the stamp duty as the
transfer of immovable property in the
present case is by way of an order gift,
which is in consonance with provisions of
Mohammedan Law. Giving reference to a
judgment of the High Court, petitioner
also indicated in his reply that no stamp
duty is payable on such type of
transaction/gift.
(3.) THE Sub Divisional Officer/Stamp Collector being not satisfied with the
reply so tendered by the petitioner passed
the impugned order and held that in order
to avoid stamp duty, documents for
registration has not been presented though
the property has been purchased.
Hence this writ petition.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.