JUDGEMENT
DEVI PRASAD SINGH,J. -
(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
(2.) THIS writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred against the impugned order
dated 1.5.2007 by which the petitioner's
representation has been rejected declining
to grant the higher pay-scale in terms of
Government Order dated 26th Sept., 1990
(Annexure-11 to the writ petition) on the
ground that the petitioner has already
retired from service. While he was in
service, he was not a regular employee
and attained the age of superannuation
before receiving the recommendation of
U.P. Public Service Commission
(hereinafter referred to as "the
Commission").
The Petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Junior Engineer
(Civil) in the Irrigation Department and
joined on the said post on 4th August,
1957. His services were approved by the Commission on the said post and
confirmed from 1.1.1966. A seniority list
was prepared in which the petitioner was
placed at serial No. 595 and two other
persons namely Jagdish Pradesh Saxena
and Jagdish Prasad Gupta were placed at
serial No. 618 and 615 respectively
against the 25% vacancies falling within a
quota of promotees in the cadre of
Assistant Engineer (Civil). The petitioner
was promoted on ad-hoc basis on
14.8.1989 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition).
(3.) KEEPING in view a length of satisfactory service of the petitioner, the
petitioner was entitled for regularisation
under the provision of The U.P.
Regularisation of Ad-hoc Promotion (on
posts within the purview of Public Service
Commission) Rules 1988 (hereinafter
referred to as "the Rule"). However, he
could not be regularized under the Rule
during the period of his employment.
Petitioner attained the age of
superannuation on 31.12.1994.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.