ATAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P.
LAWS(ALL)-2011-7-341
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on July 08,2011

ATAR SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

IMTIYAZ MURTAZA, SHYAM SHANKAR TIWARI, J. - (1.) THIS appeal has come up before us for consideration of prayer for bail of the appellant who has been convicted by Addl. Sessions Judge Court No. 4 Moradabad i S.T. No. 593 of 2006 under sections 302/149, 307/149, 323/149, 147 and 148 I.P.C. and sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 25,000/ -, seven years imprisonment and fine of Rs. 7000/ -, six months imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500/ -, one years imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1000/ - and two years imprisonment and fine of Rs. 2000/ - respectively with default stipulation.
(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri O.P. Mishra, and perused the lower court 'srecord. According to the prosecution case appellant Vijay was armed with fire arm, Atar Singh alias Bhoora, Raju alias Rajeev, Babloo, Omkar alias Dhautali, Jeevan, Mayaram, Vishesh alias Vijay Kumar, Vijay were armed with Lathi, Tabal and Kassi. Appellant Om Pal is alleged to be armed with knife. All the accused persons assaulted the deceased and injured with their respective weapons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the Sessions Judge has wrongly convicted the appellant with the aid of section 149 I.P.C. All the injuries received by the injured are simple in nature and most of the injuries are on non vital part. Further it is argued that the deceased and injured have received simple injuries and the Sessions Judge has also convicted the appellants under section 323/149 I.P.C. Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposing the prayer for bail of the appellant submitted that the occurrence took place in a broad day light and there are sufficient evidence against the appellants. Considering the respective submissions of learned counsel for the parties, facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the merits of the case in our opinion the appellants are entitled to be released on bail. Pending appeal, appellants, Atar Singh alias Bhoora,Raju alias Rajiv, Suddal alias Sardar Singh, Babloo, Maya Ram and Meevan alias Jeevaram convicted in S. T. No. 593 of 2006 be released on each of them executing a personal bond and on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. Till further orders realization of fine shall also remain stayed. Ordered Accordingly.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.