JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) HEARD Sri Arun Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned State Counsel as well as Sri M.M. Asthana, learned counsel
appearing for opposite parties no. 2 to 4.
The facts, in brief, as stated by learned counsel for the petitioners ,
are that on 29.8.2002 , an advertisement ( Annexure no.1 to the writ
petition) was in issued in Daily Newspaper ' Danik Jagran' for
appointment on the post Assistant Teacher in the institutions , managed
and run by the U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishand , Faizabad.
(2.) FURTHER , in the said advertisement the essential qualification which is to be possessed by the candidate for appointment on the post in
question mentioned in Column 2 .
As per submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners that
petitioners , who posses C.P.Ed Degree submitted their candidature in
response to the said advertisement. However, their candidature were
rejected and not called for interview on the ground that they did not
possess the requisite qualification . Hence the present writ petition has
been filed with the prayer that the opposite parties may be directed to
issue admit card, and to allow them to participate in the interview
whenever the same is held in pursuant to the advertisement issued by Zila
Basic Shiksha Adhikari , Faizabad and another relief which has been
prayed that the opposite parties be directed not to exclude the
petitioners from consideration for appointment as Assistant Teacher in
the Primary Schools of Rural Areas of district Faizabad run and managed
by the U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad on the ground that they had
equivalent degree of C.P.Ed. .
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that impugned action on the part of the respondents thereby rejecting the petitioners ' case for
appointment and not calling them for interview on the ground that they
did not possess the requisite qualification as per terms of the
advertisement for the post in question, is an action which is wholly
illegal and arbitrary as the C.P.Ed. Degree possessed by the petitioners
is equivalent to B.T.C. as such they are fully eligible for consideration
for appointment on the post in question as per terms of the advertisement
so the opposite parties may be directed to issue admit card and call them
for interview/test in pursuance to the advertisement and select them on
the post in question.
(3.) SRI . M.M. Asthana, learned counsel for respondents, while opposing the writ petition submits that as per rules known as U.P.
Education ( Teachers) Service Rules 1981( amended by notification dated
28..6.1993 in exercise of its power under Section 19(2) (9) of the 1972 Act., the rule 8 of the said service rules 1981 provides intermediate
Education U.P. or any other qualification reconsigned by the State
Government as equivalent thereto together with the training qualification
consisting of basic teacher training (BTC) , Hindustani Teacher
Certificate , Junior Teacher Certificate, Certificate of Teacher in other
course reconsigned by the State Government as equivalent thereto.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.