SUNIL ALIAS SEWAK Vs. STATE OF U.P.
LAWS(ALL)-2011-2-362
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on February 01,2011

Sunil Alias Sewak Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) SINCE both the appeals are arising out of the judgment and order dated 9.3.2010, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 16, Allahabad, convicting and sentencing the Appellants in Session Trial No. 349 of 2007, arising out of case crime No. 203 of 2006, under Sections 302/34, 436/34 IPC and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. George Town, District Allahabad, therefore, the prayer for bail in these appeals is being disposed of by means of a common order.
(2.) HEARD Shri B. K. Tripathi, the learned Counsel for the Appellant appearing for the Appellant Sunil alias Sewak, Shri A. K. Awasthy and Shri Imran Ibrahim, holding the brief of Shri Manish Tewary, the learned Counsels for the complainant and the learned AGA for the State and perused the record. In spite of notice dated 1.2.2011 being given by the learned Counsel Shri B. K. Tripathi to counsel in Criminal Appeal No. 1646 of 2010, as per the directions given at the top of our list, his clerk Shri A. K. Mishra has made an endorsement that the learned Counsel for the Appellants appearing in the connected appeal No. 1646 of 2010 refused to receive the said notice. We severely deprecate this kind of malpractice. The said notice dated 1.2.2011 with the clerk's endorsement is taken on record. As per the practice of this Court mentioned on our list, we propose to pass orders on the bail applications on behalf of all the Appellants in these criminal appeals.
(3.) IT is submitted by the learned Counsel for the Appellant, that the role of firing on the deceased Shashi Verma with country made pistols was assigned to the Appellants Rajesh Sonker alias Rajesh Kana and Mangal alias Mangala Sonker.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.