PURSHOTTAM PRASAD MURYA Vs. U.P.POWER CORPORATION LIMITED
LAWS(ALL)-2011-2-312
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on February 21,2011

Purshottam Prasad Murya Appellant
VERSUS
U.P.POWER CORPORATION LIMITED Respondents

JUDGEMENT

SUDHIR AGARWAL - (1.) The respondents no. 5 to 11 are working on different sub stations on account of vacancy caused for different reasons on the post of Junior Engineer under whom the said substations were placed. The charge of Junior Engineer has been assigned to these respondents who are working in concerned substations with the clear averment that this will not give any extra advantage of remuneration, honorarium etc. to these persons and arrangement has been made making them Incharge Junior Engineer for the period of three months only.
(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a kind of promotion and though petitioner is working elsewhere in the different substations they are entitled to be considered for such promotion. The submission is thoroughly misconceived. It is a kind of local arrangement made due to vacancy having caused thereat may be on account of transfer, retirement or any other reason of the concerned Junior Engineer under whom the said office worked and till regular promotions are made, at local level as stopgap arrangement the senior most person in the concerned substation has been given charge on the said post.
(3.) A Division Bench in Vinod Kumar Makhija and others Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2004 (1) UPLBEC 87 has considered a similar argument and repelled the same observing as under: "4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that certain employees who are junior engineers and are junior to the petitioner are officiating as engineers, and the petitioners are senior to them. In our opinion, this does not confer any right to the petitioners to officiate as engineers. For example, if a District Judge of certain district is elevated as a High Court Judge or is transferred, then ordinarily the senior most Additional District Judge in that district is allowed to officiate as District Judge, even though there may be other Additional District Judges in the State who may be senior to such person. In such circumstances, those senior persons cannot claim that they should also be appointed as officiating District Judge. There may be a situation where a competent junior person is allowed to officiate on the higher post whereas an incompetent or average senior person is not allowed to officiate on the higher post. This kind of ad hoc appointment on a higher post confers no right to the post, and the person so promoted in an ad hoc or officiating capacity can be reverted without giving opportunity of hearing." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.