JUDGEMENT
SUDHIR AGARWAL -
(1.) The respondents no. 5 to 11 are working on different sub stations on account of vacancy caused for different reasons on the
post of Junior Engineer under whom the said substations were
placed. The charge of Junior Engineer has been assigned to these
respondents who are working in concerned substations with the
clear averment that this will not give any extra advantage of
remuneration, honorarium etc. to these persons and arrangement
has been made making them Incharge Junior Engineer for the
period of three months only.
(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a kind of promotion and though petitioner is working elsewhere in the
different substations they are entitled to be considered for such
promotion.
The submission is thoroughly misconceived. It is a kind of local arrangement made due to vacancy having caused thereat may
be on account of transfer, retirement or any other reason of the
concerned Junior Engineer under whom the said office worked and
till regular promotions are made, at local level as stopgap
arrangement the senior most person in the concerned substation
has been given charge on the said post.
(3.) A Division Bench in Vinod Kumar Makhija and others Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2004 (1) UPLBEC 87 has considered a
similar argument and repelled the same observing as under:
"4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that certain employees who are junior engineers and are junior to the petitioner are officiating as engineers, and the petitioners are senior to them. In our opinion, this does not confer any right to the petitioners to officiate as engineers. For example, if a District Judge of certain district is elevated as a High Court Judge or is transferred, then ordinarily the senior most Additional District Judge in that district is allowed to officiate as District Judge, even though there may be other Additional District Judges in the State who may be senior to such person. In such circumstances, those senior persons cannot claim that they should also be appointed as officiating District Judge. There may be a situation where a competent junior person is allowed to officiate on the higher post whereas an incompetent or average senior person is not allowed to officiate on the higher post. This kind of ad hoc appointment on a higher post confers no right to the post, and the person so promoted in an ad hoc or officiating capacity can be reverted without giving opportunity of hearing." ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.