JUDGEMENT
Anjani Kumar, J. -
(1.) This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by two petitioners
seeking interference of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution with the following
prayers:
(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus restraining the respondents from
holding counseling with effect from 16th July, 2001 inUPSEAT-2001.
(ii) A writ order of direction in the nature of writ of mandamus restraining the respondents from
granting any preference or reservation to the girl students in the matter of assignment of either
institution or subject branch or discipline in Engineering course;
(iii) Any other writ, order or direction as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of
the present case;
(iv) Award costs of the writ petition to the petitioners.
(2.) The facts as narrated in the writ petition, which raises the controversy, are that the petitioners
appeared in Combined Entrance Examination known as U.P. State Engineering Admission Test,
2001 (hereinafter referred to as UPSEAT/ 2001). The petitioners asserted that both the
petitioners appeared in the aforesaid test and came out with flying colours. While the petitioner
No. 1 was placed at serial number 132 in the Combined merit list and petitioner No. 2 was
placed at serial No. 154 among the general category candidates.
(3.) Petitioners thereafter asserted that after the declaration of result, the respondents hold
counselling with a view to assign students to a particular college branch disciplines of the
engineering according to the merits keeping in view the quota reserved of reservation for various
categories of students as explained in the Brochure for the UPSEAT-2001 The relevant portion
of the brochure, which has been appended as Annexure-1 is part of this writ petition. The entire
brochure is also annexed as Annexure-1 to the rejoinder affidavit which refers at page 25 at item
No. 14 under the heading "BASIS OF SELECTION FOR ADMISSION, ALLOTMENT OF
INSTITUTION AND BRANCH", reads as under :
14.1. MERIT LIST
The merit list will be prepared only on the basis of marks secured by the candidates in UPSEAT
Examination.
No candidate shall be included in merit list if he/she fails to secure minimum qualifying marks in
aggregate in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics in Group A or Group C; or AG-I, AG-II,
AG-III in Group B; or Biology, Physics, Chemistry in Group D; or in the aggregate of all the
four subjects in Group E, F, G or H (for direct admission to second year). The Group E, F, G &
H candidates may also be considered for admission to first year of different courses depending
upon their eligibility (i.e. if they have also passed Intermediate Examination or (10+2) or
equivalent and merit. The Aptitude Test in Architecture paper (for Group C & H) shall be of
qualifying nature. The merit list of Group C candidates shall be prepared on the basis of total
marks obtained by them in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics papers, based on which they
shall also be eligible for admission to first year of B. E./B. Tech/B. Pharma/B. Tech.(Ag.
Engg.)/B. Tech. (Technology) courses along with the candidates of other subject groups. They
shall be eligible for admission to first year of five year B. Arch. Programme if they also obtain
qualifying marks in Aptitude Test in Architecture paper. Thus, no separate merit list of Group C
candidates will be prepared.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.