ANWAR AHMAD AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS
LAWS(ALL)-1990-2-135
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on February 05,1990

Anwar Ahmad And Another Appellant
VERSUS
STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Petitioners took agricultural loan of Rs. 30,500/- from respondent No. 1, State Bank of India and executed an agreement for repayment of the loan in ten half yearly instalments. The instalments were not paid in time. Thus, the bank initiated proceedings for recovery of the outstanding dues. It is at this stage that the present writ petition was filed.
(2.) At the admission stage on 24.5.1978 Hon'ble H.N. Seth and Hon'ble B.N. Sapru, JJ. Passed the following stay order : "Issue notice. Learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondents Nos. 2 and 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners may serve respondent No. 1 personally with the notice of the application and the writ petition within three weeks from today. Notice issued to the respondents shall state that the stay application shall be listed for hearing on 10.7.1978. In order to enable learned counsel to effect service on respondent No. 1, as directed, office will hand over necessary copies of notice etc. to him by tomorrow. He will file an affidavit indicating that he has served the respondents before 10.7.1978. Heard counsel for the petitioners. We are satisfied that unless an interim order is made, recovery may he effected from the petitioners as arrears of land revenue which it may not be possible to compensate in terms of money. We accordingly direct that until 10.7.1978 and subject to further orders that may be passed on that date, respondents shall not take steps to recover the amount of Rs. 24,699.22p. from the petitioners provided the petitioner deposits a sum of Rs. 8,000/- with respondent No. 1 before 1st July, 1978 and further goes on deposting monthly instalments of Rs. 8,000/- and 4,000/- respectively by 1st August and 1st September. In case of default the stay order shall stand vacated. List on 10.7.1978."
(3.) A bare perusal of the stay order will show that the petitioners were permitted to repay the outstanding demand in instalments.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.