BABOO Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-1980-8-19
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on August 18,1980

BABOO Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

V.K.Mehrotra - (1.) BY his judgment dated May 25, 1976 in Sessions Trial Nos. 339 of 1975 State v. Giri Singh and others and 156 of 1976 State v. Shanker the Ilnd Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura convicted Jamuna Das, his son Baboo, Sushil, Shanker son of Gappoo and his brothers Hari, Radhey and Ramesh under section 307 IPC read with section 149 IPC, section 148 IPC and section 147 IPC and awarded a sentence of five years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200/- two years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 100/- and one year's rigorous imprisonment (under section 147 IPC to Jamuna Das) respectively making the sentence of imprisonment concurrent. Co-accused Girish and Gappoo were acquitted. Feeling aggrieved, the convicted persons have come to this court in this appeal.
(2.) THE incident out of which the present case arose is said to have taken place about 8 A. M. on July 20, 1973 when, it is said, the appellants together with the two acquitted co-accused and three more persons surrounded PW 4 Ballabh near the Dharamshala of accused Jamuna Das while he was going to the vegetable market and started belabouring him. Ballabh's brother Ram Babu (PW 1), his nephew Kishno and Mahesh and Hori Lal went running there on hearing the alarm with a view to save Ballabh when appellants Ramesh and Hari fired at them with a view to kill them with country made pistols. Mahesh was hit by pellets. Kishno and Ballabh sustained spear injuries, when they were assaulted near their shop where they had sought refuge. Raj Bahadur Vederia (PW 3) and Shiva witnessed the assault. Amongst the assailants, appellants Ramesh and Hari had country made pistols. Radhey and Shanker had Pharsa. Baboo, Sushil and co-accused Girish had spears while the rest had lathis with them. Ballabh, Mahesh (PW 2) and Kishno who had sustained injuries accompanied PW 1 Ram Babu to Police Station Baldeo at a distance of about six and a half miles from the place of the incident in Qasba Gokul and a report about the assault was lodged at 9.15 A. M. there by Ram Babu. Sub-Inspector Naubat Singh (PW 5) was present when the report was bdged. He entered upon investigation forthwith and eventually submitted a chargesheet against the accused persons on August 14, 1973. He had sent the injured persons for their medical examination to the Public Health Centre at Baldeo where the Medical Officer Incharge Dr. Daulat Ram (PW 6) examined their injuries which were found to be as under : (Injuries of Mahesh, Kishno and Ballabh caused to them by fire-arm, sharp cutting weapon and penetrating object quoted-Editor). The injuries had been examined on July 21, 1973 between 1 P. M. and 1.35 P. M. Accused Jamuna Das also lodged a report against PW 1 Ram Babu and 13 other persons the same day at 9.35 A.M. giving his version of the incident. When he went to lodge the report he was accompanied by appellants Baboo, Sushil and Ramesh who had injuries on their person. These injuries were also examined by Dr. Daulat Ram same day and were as follows According to the Doctor, the injuries were superficial in character and could be self-inflicted.
(3.) AMONGST the various witnesses examined by the prosecution in support of its case, PW 1 Ram Babu, PW 2 Mahesh, PW 3 Vederiaya and PW 4 Ballabh gave an eye witness account of the incident. The testimony of Vederiya was found to be unworthy of belief by the Trial Judge who, however, believed the testimony of the others and convicted the present appellants, as aforesaid after negativing the defence version. During the pendency of the present appeal, appellant Jamuna Das died. His appeal has, thus abated. Amongst the surviving appellants three namely, Baboo, Sushil and Ramesh have asserted that while they were sitting aloDgwith Jamuna Das on the Chabutara of the Dharamshala, PW 1 Ram Babu and 13 others assaulted them with various weapons with which they were armed and that in order to save themselves and Jamuna Das they took recourse to throwing of brick bats and bottles at the assailants. The other appellants denied their presence and participation at the spot.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.