JUDGEMENT
P.N.Bakshi, J. -
(1.) This application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. arises in the following circumstances. It appears
that a report was lodged at the Police Station Kanuj and registered as Crime No. 365 of 1977
under Section 307 Indian Penal Code against the accused. Investigation was conducted and
police submitted its final report. The Magistrate did not accept this report and passed the
following order on 29th May, 1977. "Register. Prepare copies. Issue Summons to the accused
persons fixing 16-6-1979 for appearance." Aggrieved thereby the instant application has been
filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C.
(2.) I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and have also perused the impugned order.
(3.) Learned Counsel for the applieant has argued that a Magistrate is bound in law to accept the
final report, which is submitted to him by the Investigating Agency under Section 173(3),
Criminal P. C. To my mind the Expression "Final Report" has been misunderstood as a report
whereby the police merely recommends the dropping of proceedings. If Section 173, Cr.P.C. is
considered in detail, one would find that under Sub-clause (2) of that Section seven particulars
are required to be given, which have been shown as Sub-clauses (2)(i)(a) to (g). This indicates
that all these details must be given in the final report, so that the the Magistrate may apply his
own mind on the question, before he accepts the report, or refuses to accept it, Merely because
the Investigating Agency expresses an opinion in that report, that it is not a fit case where
cognizance should be taken by the Magistrate under Section 190, Cr.P.C. is by itself no ground
for drawing the inference that, that opinion alone must be taken into consideration as final and
the Magistrate must completely shut his eyes to all the rest of the details, which have been
embodied in the final report, as required under Section 173(a) to (g).;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.