DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PARTABGARH Vs. UNIVERSAL FILM CO INDIA LTD
LAWS(ALL)-1950-4-12
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD (AT: LUCKNOW)
Decided on April 10,1950

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PARTABGARH Appellant
VERSUS
UNIVERSAL FILM CO. (INDIA) LTD. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Ghulam Hasan, J. - (1.) These are two connected appeals arising out of a suit for recovery of rupees 1280-13-4 brought by the respondent against the appellant.
(2.) The plaintiff is a limited liability Company called the Universal Film Company Limited, Lucknow. It went into voluntary liquidation on 13th December 1941, and Mr. Kashi Prasad, Advocate, was appointed liquidator. Rai Krishna Pal Singh, the taluqdar of Birapur, who is now represented by the Deputy-Commissioner of Pratapgarh in charge of the Court of Wards, purchased 100 shares of the Company at RS. 10 each share for a sum of Rs. 1000. These shares were allotted to him on 25th November 1936. Rai Krishna Pal Singh paid Rs. 250 upon allotment and he was still liable to pay the balance of Rs. 750 according to the Company. Rai Krishna Pal Singh was a director of this Company also at one time. He did not pay the sum due from him, whereupon, the Company brought a suit for recovery of, that amount plus Rs. 513-13-4 as interest at 12 per cent. per annum according to Article 25 of the Memorandum and Articles of Association (Ex. 5). The total sum claimed was Rs. 1280-134.
(3.) The defence with which we are concerned in the present appeal was that the notification under Section 9, Court of Wards Act was issued against Rai Krishna Pal Singh on 21st October 1939, and his estate was taken over by the Court of Wards on 23rd May 1941 under Section 8 (1) (d) (iii) and (iv), U. P. Court of Wards Act. A notification inviting claims under Section 17 of the Act was published in the U. P. Gazette on 21st June 1941 (EX. 3) but the Company did not notify their claim as required by that section, hence the suit was not maintainable. The other defence was that the suit was barred by three years' rule of limitation and the company was in any case not entitled to charge any interest as after liquidation Article 25 of the Articles of Association had lost its force and the rights of the parties are governed by the Indian Companies Act which does not provide for any interest to be charged by the Company.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.