ARUNA DEVI Vs. STATE OF U.P.
LAWS(ALL)-2020-2-71
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on February 13,2020

ARUNA DEVI Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Vishal Tandon learned Brief Holder for the State respondents and Sri P.N. Saxena learned Senior Counsel who has appeared for the respondent No. 6.
(2.) The challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 11 April 2008 passed by the Director Education (Secondary) as also to the order of 11 September 2001 passed by the District Inspector of Schools Ghaziabad. By the first order the Director Education has proceeded to dispose of a claim as laid by the petitioners here for their continuance in the institution in question and for payment of salary pursuant to directions issued by a learned Judge on Writ Petition No. 35290 of 2001. The challenge to the order of 11 September 2001 is clearly misconceived since that order had already been quashed by the learned Judge while rendering judgment on the writ petition aforementioned. That leaves the Court only to deal with the validity of the order passed by the Director.
(3.) In the earlier round of litigation, the petitioners approached this Court by way of Writ Petition No. 35290 of 2001 challenging the orders passed by the District Inspector of Schools in terms of which he had come to hold that they had been appointed in the institution beyond the permissible and sanctioned strength and that consequently their continuance was illegal. The learned Judge allowed that writ petition on 24 September 2007 in the following terms: - "Looking into the above said facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, particularly in view of the joint request, both these writ petitions are disposed of at this stage. The impugned orders dated 11.9.2001(Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition No. 35290 of 2001) and dated 1.8.2006 and 17.8.2006 (Annexures No. 17 and 18 to the writ petition No. 47345 of 2006 are hereby quashed. The matter is sent to the Director of Education who shall look into the matter and pass a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, after affording full opportunity of hearing to both the parties expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of a certified copy of this order along with copies of the writ petitions, counter and rejoinder affidavits and all documents annexed therewith are placed before it. However, as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners no salary shall be released to the petitioner in respect with their services till the aforesaid decision in the matter by the Director of Education." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.