JUDGEMENT
SANGEETA CHANDRA,J. -
(1.) This petition was originally filed, praying for quashing of Rule 6(i)(a) and Rule 5(xv)(Gha) of the Government
Order dated 20.9.2014, and Government Order dated
14.4.2016 respectively and for quashing of the order dated 26.8.2019 passed by the District Social Welfare Officer, Lucknow, (opposite party no.3), rejecting the
representation of the petitioners for full fee and scholarship
reimbursement and for a direction to the opposite party
nos.1 to 4 to release the remaining scholarship and fee
reimbursement for academic years 2015-16, 2017-18, and
2018-19 and also for issuance of a mandamus commanding the University (Opposite party no.5) and City Academy Law
College (opposite party no.6) to allow the petitioners to
submit their examination form and take the forthcoming
semester examinations of LL.B. Honours Five-years Course.
(2.) This writ petition was filed on 5.9.2019 and an amendment application was moved on 16.9.2019, praying
for a mandamus directing the opposite party no.6 to
demand and charge the fees correctly and also to direct the
State-respondents to take necessary action against the(2)
opposite party no.6 for charging excess fee from the
petitioners. A further mandamus was sought to the
opposite party no.5, the University to give the details of
course fee for LL.B. Honours Five-years Course as fixed by
it for private unaided institutions like the opposite party
no.6. Further, an amendment application was later filed on
15.7.2020, praying for addition of certain pleadings and also for a direction to be issued to the opposite parties to
immediately release the remaining amount of scholarship
and fee reimbursement also for the year 2019-20, and a
mandamus to be issued to the opposite party nos.1 to 5 to
fix the course fee of LL.B. Honours Five-years Course of
opposite party no.6, and a direction to be issued to the
University and the College concerned to allow the
petitioners to appear in the forthcoming semester
examination. This amendment application was allowed on
16.9.20.
(3.) The aforesaid reliefs have been claimed by the petitioners while alleging that they had initially filed Writ
Petition No.10763 (MS) of 2019 (Aditya Tiwari and another
versus State of U.P. and others), which has been disposed
off by this Court with a direction to the petitioners to
submit a fresh representation before the District Social
Welfare Officer, Lucknow, who would pass a reasoned and
speaking order thereon. It has been submitted that the
representation of the petitioners has been rejected
arbitrarily by the opposite party no.3.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.