MOHD. RIYAZUDDIN Vs. STATE OF U.P.
LAWS(ALL)-2020-1-160
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on January 09,2020

Mohd. Riyazuddin Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. - (1.) Heard Sri Alok Mishra, learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for State functionaries.
(2.) This writ petition was filed with the following prayer: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent concerned to make payment of 50% salary as back wages to the petitioner till his reinstatement in the service as well as other consequential benefits of service like seniority and regular increments etc." However, when the matter was taken up today, counsel for petitioner very fairly confined his prayer that the authorities concerned may consider his claim and fix notional seniority and give consequential benefits arising thereto.
(3.) It is contended that petitioner had applied for the post of Urdu Translator/Assistant Junior Clerk pursuant to the written examination conducted in the year 1995. In the select list, so prepared, he was placed at Sl.No.22. On 24.2.1995, District Magistrate directed the District Supply Officer, Maharajganj to appoint petitioner as Urdu Translator/Junior Clerk. As the selection process of Urdu Translator was put to challenge, Lucknow Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.5.1995 stayed the selection process.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.