SUNIL @ LALA Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS
LAWS(ALL)-2010-2-218
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on February 23,2010

Sunil @ Lala Appellant
VERSUS
State Of U.P.And Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

SATYENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, SHRI KANT TRIPATHI, JJ. - (1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. as well as Counsel for the com­plainant.
(2.) SUBMISSION of learned Counsel for the petitioners is that according to the medical report, the age of the girl has been found to be 17 years and it is a marginal case as the girl is not educated and no school certificate is available with her, therefore, the discretion of two years mar­gin will be exercised in favour of the girl. He further submits that once the girl is found to be major, it is to be presumed that she has married petitioner No. 1 on her own sweet will and in the present case the girl is having a child as well. Counsel for the complainant, however, has refuted the above allegations and has only submitted that the girl is minor, there­fore, she cannot contract the marriage. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties and having gone through the record, we find that according to the medi­cal opinion the girl has been found to be 17 years and there should be variation of two years on either side and since the girl is having a child out of the wedlock of hus­band and they are living peacefully and happily, no useful purpose would be served in annulling the marriage at this stage when the Court finds that the giral is major and she was having authority under law to contract the marriage. Marriage having been solem­nized at the behest of the major girl, it can­not be said that there was any illegality in contracting the marriage. Since both the husband and wife are major, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in prolong­ing the criminal proceedings any further on the basis of the F.I.R. lodged by the com­plainant. The law in this regard has been settled by the Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and another, 2006 (56) ACC 234 (SC) = 2006 (44) AIC 47 (SC) and we are also in agreement with the legal proposition laid down in the above case.
(3.) ACCORDINGLY , we quash the F.I.R. contained in Annexure No. 1 and direct the authorities to allow the husband and wife to live peacefully and will not create any hindrance in their peaceful living. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is allowed. Petition Allowed.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.