UDAIPAL AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
LAWS(ALL)-2010-9-365
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on September 01,2010

Udaipal and Ors. Appellant
VERSUS
State of U.P. And Anr. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Rajesh Dayal Khare, J. - (1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.
(2.) THE present 482 Cr.P.C. petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 537 of 2007 State v. Mahipal Singh and Ors., under Sections , , I.P.C., Police Station Jasrana, District Firozabad pending before learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No. 5). District Firozabad as well as for quashing of summoning order dated on 09.07.2010 issued in the aforesaid case. The contention of the counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. It is further contended that the injured had given statement in the earlier investigation that there was an old enmity with the applicants and the opposite party No. 2. It is next contended that three persons are said to have been committed the offence but there is a single gun shot injury.
(3.) FROM the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submission made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866; State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426; State of Bihar v. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Mohd. Saraful Haq and Anr., 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicants have got right of discharge under Section or / or Cr.P.C. as the case may be through a proper application for the said purpose and they are free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.