VINOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF U. P. AND OTHERS
LAWS(ALL)-2010-2-185
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on February 10,2010

VINOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Appellant
VERSUS
State of U. P. and others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) On oral prayer made by Shri R.N. Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner, he is permitted to correct the description of respondent No. 1 in the array of parties in the writ petition as well as in the stay application.
(2.) We have heard Shri R.N. Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Pankaj Saxena, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 6.
(3.) Affidavits have been exchanged between the parties. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of at this stage.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.