NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. JAI DEO SINGH AND OTHERS
LAWS(ALL)-2010-1-246
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on January 22,2010

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Appellant
VERSUS
Jai Deo Singh and others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

DEVI PRASAD SINGH, S.C.CHAURASIA, JJ. - (1.) HEARD Shri R. C. Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Rajendra Jaiswal, learned counsel appearing for the claimant respondents.
(2.) IN brief, the deceased Pradeep Kumar Singh alias Deepu Singh while going from Unnao to Bahurajmau along with one Manoj Singh suffered with an accident on 25.11.2000 at about 10.30 a.m. with Jeep No. UP 35-A/7510. It has been stated that the driver of the jeep was driving the vehicle rashly and negligently and in consequence thereof, the accident occurred. In the said accident, the pillion rider of the motorcycle suffered with grievous injuries and later on Pradeep Kumar Singh alias Deepu Singh succumbed to the injuries. The deceased was aged about 20 years and was a student of B.Com. The monthly income has been stated to the tune of Rs. 3,000 per month. A first information report was lodged and the dependents of the deceased approached the Tribunal for payment of compensation for an amount of Rs. 7,55,000. The Tribunal has framed four issues, out of which issue No. 1 relates to the accident alleged to have occurred on 25.11.2000 at about 10.30 with jeep. Issue No, 2 relates to insurance of the jeep and issue No. 3 relates to driving licence. The Tribunal recorded a finding that the accident was occurred because of rash and negligent driving of Jeep No. UP 35-A/7510. The prosecution has produced oral witnesses, i.e., P.W. 1 Jaidev Singh, claimant petitioner and P.W. 2 Rajveer Singh. Shri Rahul Bajpai, owner of the vehicle himself appeared as D.W. 1 whereas on behalf of the appellant National Insurance Company, one Sanjay Trivedi appeared as D.W. 2. The factum of accident was duly proved by the witnesses. It has also been proved that the jeep was insured by the appellant insurance company and after the accident, Sanjay Bajpai had moved appropriate application for payment of insured amount to the appellant insurance company.
(3.) HOWEVER , the argument advanced by the appellant's counsel relates to the driving licence. Mr. R. C. Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the jeep was driven by one Kallu Bajpai who did not possess driving licence. In the criminal case, a charge-sheet was filed against Kallu Bajpai.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.