IMRAN AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
LAWS(ALL)-2010-9-383
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on September 01,2010

Imran And Ors. Appellant
VERSUS
State of U.P. And Anr. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Rajesh Dayal Khare, J. - (1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.
(2.) THE present 482 Cr.P.C. petition has been filed for quashing the summoning order dated 05.01.2010 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 13, District Jaunpur in Complaint Case No. 6439 of 2009 Farooq v. Imran and Ors., under Sections , , , , I.P.C. The contention of the counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. It is further contended that the sister of the applicant No. 1 had initiated proceedings against the opposite party No. 2 under Section Cr.P.C., and the applicant No. 1 had also filed a complaint case against the in -laws of his sister under Sections , , , I.P.C., in which they were summoned and as a counter blast to the same, the present proceedings has been launched against by the opposite party No. 2 against the applicants which is not sustainable in law.
(3.) FROM the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submission made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866; State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426; State of Bihar v. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Mohd. Saraful Haq and Anr., 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicants have got right of discharge under Section or / or Cr.P.C. as the case may be through a proper application for the said purpose and they are free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.