JUDGEMENT
Rajesh Dayal Khare, J. -
(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State -respondent.
(2.) THIS Court vide order dated 30.4.1991 had issued notice to the opposite party to file counter affidavit and in the mean time further proceedings of Case No. 1134 of 1990, under Sections 406, 420 IPC, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, were stayed. Office report dated 13.8.2010 indicates that the learned Counsel for the applicant has not taken steps through registered post for service upon the opposite party.
(3.) THE present 482 Cr.P.C. petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings of Case No. 1134 of 1990, Bharat Textile v. Brij Lal, under Sections 406, 420 IPC, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur. The contention of the counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.