JUDGEMENT
Rajesh Dayal Khare, J. -
(1.) HEARD Sri Sumit Gopal, learned Counsel for the applicant and Sri I.M. Khan, learned Counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of applicant by filing his parcha today in the Court, which is taken on record and learned A.G.A. for the State.
(2.) THE present petition under Section Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing order dated 13.05.2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No. 2), District Rampur in Sessions Trial No. 14 of 1995 State v. Babar Mian and Ors. under Section I.P.C. Police Station Ganj, District Rampur. It is contended by learned Counsel for the applicant that earlier an application was moved on behalf of the applicant under Section Cr.P.C. for summoning the P.W.6, which application was rejected by the learned Court below by an order dated 24.04.2010 and the same was challenged by the applicant by means of Criminal Misc. Application (482) No. 15622 of 2010 before this Court and another Bench of this Court vide its Judgment and order dated 05.05.2010, copy of which is annexed as Annexure -3 to the petition declined to interfere with the order dated 24.04.2010 whereby the application under Section Cr.P.C. was rejected but liberty was granted to applicant to file fresh application under Section Cr.P.C. as in the opinion of the Court, the application earlier moved was vague in nature. It is further contended that the applicant moved another application on 13.05.2010 wherein two specific questions were indicated which were sought to be put to the witness sought to be summoned but the same was again rejected by the Court below vide its order dated 13.05.2010. It is next contended by learned Counsel for the applicant that P.W.6 in his statement has stated that he is not aware about the whereabouts of the Maruti car and therefore it is necessary to cross examine him.
(3.) AFTER hearing the learned Counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and after perusing the averments made in the present application as well as order impugned, this Court is of the opinion that one last opportunity be given to the applicant to cross examine the P.W.6 within a specific time.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.