G.B.PANT UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY, PANT NAGAR Vs. SUR SUTI
LAWS(ALL)-2010-12-194
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on December 02,2010

G.B.Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pant Nagar Appellant
VERSUS
Sur Suti Respondents

JUDGEMENT

V.K.BIST,BARIN GHOSH,C.J. - (1.) DELAY Condonation Application No. 5069 of 2010 The application for condonation of delay is allowed. Delay in filing the Special Appeal is hereby condoned. Special Appeal No. 108 of 2010 By consent of the parties, the appeal is taken up for hearing.
(2.) UTTAR Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 enables compassionate appointment of a member of the family of a deceased employee, who has died in harness. Rule 2 (c) thereof gives an inclusive definition to 'family'. Widowed daughter-in-law has not been specifically mentioned in the said Rule to be included in family. The said Rule came to be considered by Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Zila Panchayat, Kaushambi and another vs. Lalti Devi and another, 2008 (1) AWC 1035 in the backdrop of a claim that a widowed daughter-in-law is also a part of the family. Division Bench held so. Since in terms of the said Rules, a member of the family is entitled to a compassionate appointment, Division Bench held that a widowed daughter-in-law is also entitled to a compassionate appointment under the said Rules.
(3.) CHAPTER XIII (1) (d) of the Statute of the appellant - University provides that a dependant (wife or husband, son, unmarried daughter and widowed daughter) of an employee of the University, who meets with untimely death or gets permanent disability during the service period, may be appointed on any non-teaching post for which he/she is suitable and fulfils the minimum qualifications, without selection procedure. The father-in-law of the respondent, an employee of the appellant - University, died in harness. Husband of the respondent predeceased his father. The respondent, the widowed daughter-in-law of the deceased employee, accordingly, applied for a compassionate appointment. The application was rejected, on the ground that the respondent does not come within dependant as defined in the Statute.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.