JUDGEMENT
Sabhajeet Yadav, J. -
(1.) Although the country had become free from
British imperialism on 15 August, 1947 about 63 years ago, but millions of people
are still suffering from poverty and economic disability. Constitutional guarantee
of equality of status and of opportunity and promises to establish welfare state
and egalitarian society enshrined under the preamble of the constitution, directive
principles of State policy and other provisions of the constitution have become
merely empty promise and could not become reality for them.
(2.) It is third inning of litigation before this Court. The first inning was ended by
usual direction to decide representation of the petitioner, whereupon finding no favour
with the respondents for a quite long time the petitioner was compelled to file contempt
petition, which appears to have prompted the rejection of his representation, ultimately
giving rise cause of action of instant petition. It is classic case and example of
gross-discrimination and extreme arbitrariness by the instrumentality of the state,
where a person is continuously working on daily wage basis since July 1972, (for
about four decades) and is at verge of attaining his age of superannuation without
any treatment of regular employee after serving whole life in our democratic polity.
The petitioner has been continuously denied of his constitutional rights by the
respondents on one pretext and another by legal jugglery of the state, and is
being continuously exploited on account of his wants and economic disability.
(3.) The petitioner has come forward with the case that he was appointed in the
office of respondent No. 3 as daily wage muster roll employee in July 1972, and
since then till 1983 the he was discharging his duties as daily wage muster roll
employee on the post of Mali. His initial appointment was made by U.P. State
Electricity Board but subsequently the Board was abolished and in its place U.P.
Power Corporation Ltd. and some other corporations were created and employees
of the said Corporation (Board) were permitted to be continued into new
Corporations created in place of erstwhile U.P. State Power Corporation i.e. U.P.
State Electricity Board. Thereafter the petitioner was appointed on the post of
water man on temporary basis w.e.f. 1.4.1988 to 30.9.1991 for a period of six
months in each year by four consecutive letters of appointment issued on 1st
April, 1988,1st April, 1989,1st April, 1990 and 1st April, 1991, by the respondent
No. 3 in the concerned establishment at Gorakhpur. The aforesaid letters of
appointment are on record as Annexure-1,1A, 1B and 1C to the writ petition. It is
stated that having regard to the hard working and laborious nature of the petitioner
on 13.11.1990 Superintending Engineer, Vidyut Janpad Construction Circle, U.P.
State Electricity Board, Allahabad wrote a letter to the Chief Engineer U.P. State
Electricity Board, Lucknow for seeking permission for appointment of petitioner
on permanent vacant post of Mali in Gorakhpur Division. The aforesaid letter is on
record as Annexure-2 of the writ petition.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.