SIYA RAM Vs. NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD TILHAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Rejoinder affidavit filed is taken on record.

(2.) Counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal was admitted on the substantial question of law, "Whether the lower appellate court erred in law in dismissing the suit as even a trespasser or an unauthorised occupant cannot be dispossessed except in accordance with law".

(3.) In support of his contention, he has relied upon paragraph No. 9 of the judgment rendered in Krishna Ram Mahale v. Shobha Venkat Rao, 1989 AIR(SC) 2097 which reads thus: