GOVIND BHAWAN KARYALAYA Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2010-12-33
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on December 23,2010

GOVIND BHAWAN KARYALAYA Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) BY the Court.- The question of law, that requires consideration in these two Special Appeals, is as to whether the "Variable Dearness Allowance' (VDA) in the notification dated 31.1.1992 issued under Section 4 of the Minimum of Wages Act, 1948 (in short, the Act) is linked up with the basic rate of wages.
(2.) THE Govind Bhawan Karyalaya with its registered office at 151 M.G. Road, Kolkata is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act engaged in religious and charitable works including publication of religious books. The Society carries on various activities including running a printing press at Gorakhpur known as 'Geeta Press'. The books printed and published are sold at nominal prices at various places in the country. The press is the major source of affordable religious books in the country. The Society employs unskilled, semi-skilled, skilled and highly skilled staff. They are paid wages in accordance with the notifications issued from time to time by the State Government under the Act. Learned Single Judge has dismissed both the writ petitions challenging the notification dated 31.1.1992 issued under Section 4 of the Act for the reasons: A. The consumer items have got varying prices dependant upon its quality. In the consumer basket the most essential items are food grains and cloth. The price of foodgrains and cloth varies on their quality. The persons, having different incomes including pay package, consuming a particular commodity, choose quality of that commodity in accordance with their income. If the increase of different qualities of the commodities are not afforded, then the people using different qualities of the same commodities are not affected by the increase flatly or uniformally. They are affected in proportion to the effect of that commodity. The VDA with the basic pay is more rational and logical than flat VDA. B. In certain cases the formula provided under the notification results in more than 100% neutralisation. This argument is dependent upon the presumption that all classes of workers, likely to be affected by the notification, use same quality of commodities having same price. This presumption is not correct. The same principle will apply to services also. The increase is likely to be percentage-wise and not flat. C. The challenge to the impugned notification, that the notification divides the clerical staff into two cadres, is not correct. The notification has not bifurcated the cadres of the clerical staff. The clerical staff has been classified into two groups only for the purposes of payment of dearness allowance. The classification is on the basis of length of service, in the particular establishment, i.e. one group consists of those, who have completed five years in the establishment, and others, who have not completed five years in the establishment. The classification is quite rational.
(3.) BEFORE considering the submission raised by Shri Navin Sinha, Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant, and Shri R.N. Singh appearing for the workmen respondents, it will be appropriate to refer to the notifications issued prior to the impugned notification, and the legal position, as on date. It is admitted to both the parties, that Section 4 of the Act provides for fixation of minimum wages for the employees of private printing press. Section 2 (d) of the Act defines cost of living index number; Section 3 (1) (b) provides for review of the minimum rates of wages and Section 4(1) provides for the minimum rates of wages. These provisions relevant for the purpose of deciding the appeals are quoted as below: "Section 2 (d) of the Act defines cost of living index number as follows: "Cost of living index number", in relation to employees in any scheduled employment in respect of which minimum rates of wages have been fixed, means the index number ascertained and declared by the competent authority by notification in the Official Gazette to be the cost of having index number applicable to employees in such employment;" Section 3 (1) (b) of the Act provides for review of the minimum rates of wages, which is being quoted hereunder: "(1) The appropriate Government shall in the matter hereinafter provided; (b) review at such intervals as it may think fit, such intervals not exceeding five years, the minimum rates of wages so fixed and revise the minimum rates if necessary; Provided that where for any reason the appropriate Government has not reviewed the minimum rates of wages fixed by it in respect of any scheduled employment within any interval of five years, nothing contained in this clause shall be deemed to prevent it from reviewing the minimum rates after the expiry of the said period of five years and revising them, if necessary, and until they are so revised the minimum rates in force immediately before the expiry of the said period of five years shall continue in force." Section 4 (1) of the Act which provides for the minimum rates of wages is being quoted hereunder: (1) Any minimum rate of wages fixed or revised by the appropriate Government in respect of scheduled employments under Section 3 may consist of- (i) a basic rate of wages and a special allowance at a rate to be adjusted at such intervals and in such manner as the appropriate Government may direct to accord as nearly as practicable with the variation in the cost of living index number applicable to such workers (hereinafter referred to as the "cost of living allowance"); (ii) a basic rate of wages with or without the cost of living allowance, and the cash value of the concessions in respect of supplies of essential commodities at concession rates, where so authorised; or (iii) an all inclusive rate allowing for the basic rate, the cost of living allowance and the cash value of the concessions, if any." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.